242 - Theological Questions: Analysis and Argument

Theological Questions: Analysis and Argument

By Owen C. Thomas

Wilton, Conn., Morehouse-Barlow, 1983. 133 Pp. $7.95.

Disenchanted by the great schemes of systematic, theological inquiry, the author attempts to "turn the study of theology away from systems and back to the issues which have always been the starting point of theology." He has developed a theological method aimed "specifically at the analysis, clarification, and resolution of specific theological questions." This method was developed from Thomas' premise that "the primary locus of theology is the life and work of Christians, that the

243 - Theological Questions: Analysis and Argument

beginning point of theology is simply the questions, the issues, and the problems which arise from the life and work of Christians."

Thomas presents his method in a clear, concise, and convincing first chapter called "The Locus and Method of Theology." Each of the following nineteen chapters is headed with a question, followed by an essay which serves as demonstration of the method of analysis and argument. The questions are as varied as "What is the relation between the statements 'God created me' and 'my parents produced me'"? "Should experience be the main criterion of theology?" "When Jesus prayed, who was praying to whom?" There are questions which arise from the haunts of the human heart such as "Can God be both personal and intimate?" "What is the relation of sin and neurosis?" "Are all events equally providential?"

This reviewer found the method very exciting especially as I considered the possibilities of introducing it to undergraduate student groups, well-versed in their own disciplines, but lacking confidence in theological know-how. (I likewise see the method useful in the two parishes in which I have served.) As Thomas says in the preface, "students of the method suddenly realize to their amazement that they can do theology themselves." Thomas apologizes that he is neither a biblical exegete or an historian, but his essays reveal a deep understanding of and respect for both the Scriptures and the tradition. Finally, I found the integrity of the method refreshing. The method has ample room to incorporate the mystery, ambiguity, and uncertainty that every Christian experiences. Thomas, himself, is able to leave questions unanswered. The work is recommended with enthusiasm for its freshness, integrity, and breadth.

SUE ANNE STEFFEY MORROW

Princeton University Chapel
Princeton, New Jersey